This analysis start with the confusion and problems of the author’s works in early stage (first half of 2015), which are related to three types of creation. The first is the tendency to express emotions and imagined stories, the second is the idea connected to formalism, and the third is accompanied by the thinking for Conceptual arts. The author wants to explore the possibility to integrate these seemingly contradictory things like subjective and objective, emotional and rational in a work. And make these processes appear to intertextuality. The author found that people are used to digest massages in a fast way by communicating simplified information in this age. It happened to people only see one-side of things, and also come with understanding gap. In the view of this, the author thinks we should interrogation of the knowledge used as the simplified comprehension of the diversity and complexity of the world. The author makes “forms” as a subject of creating, all things are related to standardization and integration could be it. The author thinks forms can correspond to the discussion of object materials, and the concepts could present to minds and invisible materials. In that point of view, the author will critique formalism’s opinions of aesthetics and the idea ‘Anti-object’ from a part of Conceptual arts, to find out a way for integrating forms and concepts.

The author will analyze the forms and concepts of the subject “forms” by Form-ing which is the way she uses for creating works. By discussing the ambivalence of forms’ forms and concepts and considering of various selections and methods involved in creation, the author expect art works could reveal the complexity of things, and also expose the issue that people are restricted by simplified conclusions.